Free access

Proposed research on social perception of marker-assisted selection and its role in the forests of British Columbia

Publication: The Forestry Chronicle
10 October 2014

Abstract

The forest industry is a major player in the provincial economy, provides a significant contribution to government revenue, and accounts for 3% of British Columbia's GDP. However, with the reduction of housing starts in the US in 2006, the economic crisis of 2008, a steady decline in newsprint demand, and the Mountain Pine Beetle epidemic, the provincial and federal governments have searched for ways to help transform the forest industry through innovation, improved environmental performance, and new markets. One such investment has been in marker-assisted selection (MAS), which is a genomic-based biotechnological tool that allows desired traits to be flagged on the genome. Since MAS is a new genomic tool to the forest industry, it is necessary to survey silviculture stakeholders in BC on their perception of this resource to tree breeders, its perceived use, and the context for which it should be implemented. If it is a tool whose implementation is perceived positively, it would significantly reduce the cycle of the tree breeding process, as it allows for the early selection of genotypic traits. Moreover, it would allow tree breeders to more efficiently and accurately select for improved wood qualities, growth rates, and resistance to pests, diseases, and climate change.

Résumé

L'industrie forestière est un secteur important de l’économie provinciale, représente une source significative de revenus gouvernementaux et totalise 3% du PIB de la Colombie-Britannique. Cependant, suite au déclin du nombre de mises en chantier de maison aux États-Unis en 2006, suite à la crise économique de 2008, suite à une diminution constante de la demande de papier journal et à cause de l’épidémie de dendroctone du pin, les gouvernements provincial et fédéral ont cherché des moyens d'aider à transformer l'industrie forestière par des innovations, par l'amélioration de la performance environnementale et de nouveaux marchés. L'un de ces moyens a été la sélection à l'aide de marqueur (SAM), un outil biotechnologique basé sur la génomique qui permet d'identifier dans le génome des caractéristiques désirées. Compte tenu que la SAM est un nouvel outil génomique dans le milieu de l'industrie forestière, il faut effectuer un sondage auprès des intervenants en sylviculture de la C.-B. pour pouvoir décrire leur perception de cet outil auprès des pépiniéristes, son utilisation envisagée et le contexte selon lequel elle pourrait être implantée. S'il s'agit d'un outil dont l'implantation est perçue positivement, cela permettrait de raccourcir significativement le cycle du processus d'amélioration génétique, compte tenu qu'il permet une sélection hâtive des caractéristiques génotypiques. De plus, cela permettrait aux pépiniéristes de choisir avec plus d'efficacité et de précision des spécimens démontrant des qualités ligneuses, des taux de croissance et de résistance aux ravageurs, aux maladies et aux changements climatiques plus intéressants.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

References

Brumlop, S. and M.R. Finckh. 2011. Application and potentials of marker assisted selection (MAS) in plant breeding. Bundesarnt fur Naturschutz (BfN). Available at http://www.bfn.de/0502_skripten.html [accessed 23 April 2014].
Council of Forest Industries. 2014. Citing online sources: Economics & Statistics: The Economic Contribution of BC Forest Industry [online]. Available at http://www.cofi.org/bc-forest-industry/economics-statistics/ [accessed 01 May 2014].
Fern E.F. The Use of Focus Groups for Idea Generation: The effects of Group Size, Acquaintanceship, and Moderator on Response Quantity and Quality Journal of Marketing Research 1982 19 1 1 -13 Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3151525 [accessed 25 April 2014]
Filmon, G. 2003. Firestorm 2003 Provincial Review. Available at http://bcwildfire.ca/History/ReportsAndReviews/2003/FirestormReport.pdf [accessed 21 May 2014].
Government of British Columbia, Ministry of Forests Lands and Natural Resource Operations, and British Columbia Government eBook Collection. 2012. A History of the Battle Against the Mountain Pine Beetle 2000 to 2012. Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations. Available at http://www.llbc.leg.bc.ca/public/pubdocs/bcdocs2012_2/519896/pine%20beetle%20response%20brief%20history%20may%2023%202012.pdf [accessed 23 April 2014].
NRCan. 2013. The State of Canada's Forests: Annual Report 2013. Natural Resources Canada. Available at http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/35191.pdf[accessed 23 April 2014].
NRCan. 2014a. Citing online sources: Forests of Canada: Key Facts [online]. Natural Resources Canada. Available at http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/canada/13169 [accessed 23 April 2014].
NRCan. 2014b. Citing online sources: Industry [online]. Natural Resources Canada. Available at http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/industry/13305 [accessed 23 April 2014].
LiveSmart BC. 2013. Citing online sources: Effects of Climate Change [online]. Government of British Columbia. Available at http://www.livesmartbc.ca/learn/effects.html [accessed 21 May 2014].
Ministry of Forests, Mines and Lands. 2010. The State of British Columbia's Forests, 3rd ed. Forest Practices and Investment Branch. Victoria. Available at www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/sof/index.htm#2010_report [accessed 24 April 2013].
Morgan D. L. FOCUS GROUPS Annu. Rev. Socio 1996 22 129 -152 Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083427 [accessed 25 April 2014].
Nienstaedt, H. and J.C. Zasada. n.d. White Spruce. USDA For. Serv. Available at http://www.na.fs.fed.us/pubs/silvics_manual/Volume_1/picea/glauca.htm [accessed 23 April 2014].
Rank, D. 2013. Forest Sector: Challenges, Genomic Solutions. Genome Canada. Available at http://www.genomecanada.ca/en/sectorstrategies/ [accessed 30 April 2014].
Research and Knowledge Management Branch. 2010. Forest Genetics Solutions: Biotechnology. Province of British Columbia. Available at http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hre/forgen/projects/biotechnology.htm [accessed 30 April 2014].
Samure, K. and L.M. Given. 2008. Data Saturation. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. pp. 196–197.
Smart Forests. 2012a. SMarTForests [online. Available at http://smartforests. ca/en-ca/home.aspx [accessed 23 April 2014].
Smart Forests. 2012b. GE3LS = Genomics and Society [online]. Available at http://www.smartforests.ca/en-ca/projectactivities/ge3lsgenomicsandsociety.aspx [accessed 01 May 2014].

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image The Forestry Chronicle
The Forestry Chronicle
Volume 90Number 05October 2014
Pages: 666 - 669

History

Version of record online: 10 October 2014

Key Words

  1. marker-assisted selection
  2. perception
  3. social perception
  4. genomics
  5. biotechnology
  6. forestry

Mots-clés

  1. sélection à l'aide de marqueur
  2. perception
  3. perception sociale
  4. génomique
  5. biotechnologie
  6. foresterie

Authors

Affiliations

Chelsea Nilausen
Department of Forest Resource Management, Forest Sciences Centre, 2310 – 2424 Main Mall, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4
Nancy Gélinas
Département des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Faculté de Foresterie, de Géographie et de Géomatique, 2145-A Pavillon Abitibi-Price, 2405 rue de la Terrasse, Université Laval, Québec (Québec) G1V 0A6
Gary Bull
Department of Forest Resource Management, Forest Sciences Centre, 2310 – 2424 Main Mall, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

1. Constructing the public in public perceptions research: A case study of forest genomics
2. Genomic tools for traceability: Opportunities, challenges and perspectives for the Canadian forestry sector

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to The Forestry Chronicle

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media